The content on this website is intended for investment professionals and institutional asset owners. Individual retail investors should consult with their financial advisers before using any of the content contained on this website. Breckinridge uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website, you consent to our cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. By clicking “I Agree” and accessing this website, you represent and warrant that you are agreeing to the above statements. In addition, you have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions of this website. The content on this website is not intended for use or distribution outside of the U.S., unless permitted by applicable law.

Corporate Perspective published on June 28, 2019

Tech Spends Big on Stock Buybacks, but What Gives for Bondholders?

With the implementation of corporate tax reform in 2018, much has been written about the repatriation of foreign cash onto U.S. soil and the potential impact on investment grade (IG) corporate bond performance. The Technology sector was one of the biggest beneficiaries of repatriated foreign cash.1 Like most companies in the IG space, Tech names used their cash windfall mostly for shareholder rewards, although debt issuance has materially dropped.2 However, we think Tech’s return of cash to shareholders may not be as detrimental to its credit profile as the action would be in other sectors. This is particularly important given rising concerns about the pace of U.S. growth.

Prior to tax reform, Tech companies funded buybacks primarily by issuing debt, partly due to the low-rate environment but primarily to avoid paying taxes on the repatriated cash. However, following tax reform, companies were able to tap repatriated cash to buy back shares. Between the new inflows of repatriated cash and the ongoing strong cash flows in the sector, many Tech companies were able to continue aggressive buybacks without issuing new debt or refinancing existing debt.

Figure 1 shows that debt issuance in Tech has fallen $74 billion from the first half of 2017 through the second half of 2018 – the most significant drop in issuance among all sectors. At the same time, among S&P 500 companies, the dollar value of buybacks increased the most in the Tech sector over the same time period as the ample cash has allowed Tech companies to return cash to shareholders without issuing debt.3 Gross debt leverage in the sector has strengthened from 2.28 times at the end of 2017 to 1.93 times at the end of 1Q19.4 However, net leverage has weakened from -0.16 times to 0.4 times over the same time period, driven by repatriated cash being used for share repurchases. That said, net leverage for the Tech sector remains much lower than other IG sectors.5


In recent examples of buybacks, Apple spent $86 billion on share buybacks and dividends in the 12 months ending March 31, 2019, versus $45 billion spent in fiscal 2017 prior to tax reform. In 2018, the company authorized an additional $100 billion under its buyback program, for a total of $310 billion. However, with more than $100 billion in net cash on the company`s balance sheet and $60 billion in annual free cash flow, Apple has been able to continue its buyback program without issuing additional debt.

Of course, Apple’s cash balance is an outlier in the IG space. While the up-in-quality IG Tech sector has, in our view, a generally improving credit profile, each company’s spending must be analyzed individually. For example, Cisco, a company that has had a generous buyback program (with net buybacks totaling $44 billion in aggregate over the past five years, ending April 30, 2019) is also able to comfortably service its existing authorization, given strong free cash flows and a hefty cash balance from repatriation. Meanwhile, Oracle has seen its net leverage increase from -0.5 times to 1.1 times over the past two years, ending May 31,2019, primarily due to large buybacks and dividends.

Cash Is Still King

In general, even though the Tech sector is largely using repatriated cash to buy back shares, we think that repatriation has increased financial flexibility in the sector. We have noted that despite some deleveraging, elevated debt leverage in IG credit, partly driven by high levels of buybacks and dividends, could be problematic if U.S. economic growth softens (see Corporate Bond Market Outlook Q1 2019). In our view, the Tech sector’s strong cash position may make it more resilient to any pullback in the macro environment versus other IG sectors.

In addition, the sizable cash positions in the sector help to offset some of the risks, such as data privacy concerns, anticompetitive behavior among large companies with big market share and the increasing importance of innovation. The strong free cash flow generation can help companies in the sector pay regulatory fees or fund R&D for opportunities in growth areas. Finally, ongoing business spending on software helps support the longevity of free cash flows for companies in that space.

We continue to monitor the Tech sector and seek opportunities to capitalize on the overall strong cash flows and limited need to issue debt to fund share buybacks versus other sectors. However, we recognize that each company presents its own set of risks, and thorough credit research is required.


Company specific financial information, such as buyback, dividends and leverage, were obtained from the company's public filings.

[1] Of the 20 S&P 500 Index stocks with the highest overseas cash (post-tax) as a percentage of market cap, 11 are within the Information Technology sector. Information Technology accounts for 70 percent of taxable cash held overseas, including 23 percent from Apple Inc. alone. Source: Goldman Sachs, September 25, 2017, just before the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.

[2] Barclays, as of June 14, 2019.

[3] S&P Dow Jones Indices

[4] Bloomberg Intelligence, as of April 16, 2019

[5] Bloomberg Intelligence, as of April 16, 2019

DISCLAIMER: The opinions and views expressed are those of Breckinridge Capital Advisors, Inc. They are current as of the date(s) indicated but are subject to change without notice. Any estimates, targets, and projections are based on Breckinridge research, analysis and assumptions. No assurances can be made that any such estimate, target or projection will be accurate; actual results may differ substantially.Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Nothing contained herein should be construed or relied upon as financial, legal or tax advice. All investments involve risks, including the loss of principal. An investor should consult with their financial professional before making any investment decisions.

Some information has been taken directly from unaffiliated third party sources. Breckinridge believes such information is reliable, but does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.

Any specific securities mentioned are for illustrative and example only. They do not necessarily represent actual investments in any client portfolio.

BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). BARCLAYS® is a trademark and service mark of Barclays Bank Plc (collectively with its affiliates, “Barclays”), used under license. Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors, including Barclays, own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Barclays Indices.
Neither Bloomberg nor Barclays approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.