The content on this website is intended for investment professionals and institutional asset owners. Individual investors should consult with their financial advisers before using any of the content contained on this website. Breckinridge uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website, you consent to our cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. By clicking “I Agree” and accessing this website, you represent and warrant that you are agreeing to the above statements. In addition, you have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions of this website. The content on this website is not intended for use or distribution outside of the U.S., unless permitted by applicable law.

Corporate

Commentary published on July 9, 2025

Q3 2025 Corporate Bond Market Outlook

Summary

  • Investment grade (IG) corporate bond spreads tightened 11 basis points (bps), ending the second quarter at an option-adjusted spread (OAS) of 83 bps. [1]
  • Spreads retraced most of the first quarter widening and are just 3bps wider year-to-date (YTD), as worst-case tariff risks receded and an equity market rebound drove improved sentiment. [2]
  • The yield-to-worst (YTW) for the Index was 4.99 percent on June 30, down from 5.15 percent at the end of the first quarter of 2025. We believe an IG YTW in the 83rd percentile, based on Bloomberg (BBG) data, may support demand. [3]
  • IG gross bond supply was $426 billion in the second quarter, an increase of 5 percent over the prior year. On a net basis, after heavy redemptions, issuance was just $32 billion.
  • After $44 billion in outflows in April, $66 billion flowed into taxable bond funds in May and $38 billion in the second quarter. [4] Foreign investor net corporate purchases were $109 billion YTD through April. [5]
  • IG credit metrics are stable. Leverage is steady, while margins are at a record high. [6] Capital relief and deregulation may drive earnings and mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the U.S. bank sector.
  • Tight credit spreads, solid demand, stable credit fundamentals, and tariff-related uncertainty drive a modest overweight to corporate bonds with a defensive posture.

Investment Review and Outlook

Tight Spreads, Favorable Technicals, and Stable Fundamentals Drive a Modest Overweight

During the second quarter, volatility was the name of the game. On April 2, 2025, the U.S. announced a broad package of import duties and reciprocal tariffs, which were higher than expected.7 The “shock-and-awe” of the Executive Order pushed equities sharply lower and credit spreads materially wider. For a brief time in mid-April, spreads touched 120bps or the 40th percentile. A 90-day pause for reciprocal tariffs was announced on April 9, 2025, which drove a steady recovery in equities and credit. At June 30, after 35bps of tightening from the wides, spreads were back to the 3rd percentile. 

The pause on tariffs is set to expire on July 9, driving more negotiations, the possibility of another extension, or implementation. Depending on where tariffs shake out, it is reasonable to expect volatility in the corporate market although not as acute. Spreads are tight and quality spreads have narrowed compared to history. Credit picking is still key, with our view that a slower growth, inflationary environment may emerge, driving dispersion in valuations and performance across sectors and issuers.

IG corporate new issuance began the quarter sluggishly, as some deals were tabled during the early part of April due to market conditions. However, after strong May and June tallies, gross issuance of $426 billion end 2Q25 up 5 percent year-over-year (Y/Y).

In terms of flows, it was a choppy quarter. After $47 billion of taxable bond fund outflows in April, $66 billion flowed back in during May and $38 billion for 2Q25. Still, after $107 billion in net inflows in the first quarter and $77 billion in the prior year, the second quarter’s tally represented a material slowdown compared with the first quarter and the prior year. Fortunately, other sources of demand were steady, with foreign investors’ net corporate purchases of $109 billion through April, per Treasury.8 Overall, we consider the supply/demand or technical backdrop as a modest positive for corporate bonds.

In our view, credit fundamentals remain stable with solid earnings growth and high operating margins. For now, a pause in tariffs has softened potential negative credit risks. After higher-than-forecast 13 percent growth in 1Q25, earnings growth is projected to slow to 5 percent in 2Q25.9 Capital relief and deregulation may drive earnings growth, less long-term debt issuance, and further consolidation in the U.S. bank sector.10,11 Agency corporate credit rating upgrades exceeded downgrades by about 2:1 in 2Q25.12 We view corporate credit fundamentals as supportive for the IG market.

The Breckinridge Investment Committee’s base case is for sub-par economic growth due to a slowdown in consumer spending, a softer job market, and the risk of reimposition of delayed tariffs. With baseline tariffs slowing economic growth and the labor market, we believe the Federal Reserve (Fed) will reduce interest rates twice in 2H25. Our positioning is defensive with tight spread valuations in most corporate sectors. Attractive all-in yields continue to bring inflows from yield-based buyers and drive demand for IG corporates.

Valuations

Corporate spreads were 11bps tighter in 2Q25, closing at an OAS of 83bps. IG corporates widened about 20bps in the first five trading days of April. A 90-day pause on reciprocal tariffs fueled a rebound in equities and improved sentiment in IG credit. The IG OAS stayed over 100bps until the first week of May and has narrowed steadily since then. An IG yield at 5 percent, in the 83rd percentile, may support demand. Quality spreads have narrowed with the gap between As and BBBs at 32bps for a Z-score13 of negative 1.5 compared to the average over the last five years.14

Technicals 

IG gross supply was $426 billion in 2Q25, up 5 percent Y/Y. April issuance ($125 billion) was down 12 percent from the prior year. However, May ($152 billion) and June ($149 billion) were up double-digits compared to the prior year. On a net basis after redemptions, issuance was just $32 billion. After $47 billion of outflows in April, $66 billion flowed into taxable bond funds in May and $38 billion for 2Q25. Foreign investor net corporate purchases were $109 billion YTD through April, per the U.S. Treasury Department. That is on pace to approximate the 2024 ($264 billion) and 2023 ($270 billion) amounts, indicating solid demand.15 This is subject to change depending on tariffs and the resiliency of the U.S. dollar, but foreign buying of corporates has been sticky over the last few years and has helped offset some of the variability in domestic fund flows.

Fundamentals

IG credit metrics are stable and have improved slightly. A pause in tariffs has softened potential negative credit implications, although risks remain. Leverage is steady at around 2.8 times, on a net basis, while operating margins are at a record high at 31 percent. Spread-per-turn of net leverage at 30bps is below its 10-year average of 44bps. 

Regulators are softening their stance towards Banks. Congress recently passed a resolution to roll back the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) merger review rule and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) rescinded a policy update meant to toughen merger scrutiny. Regulatory relief is accelerating, which may boost revenues and reduce compliance costs.

[1] The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate IG Bond Index, Breckinridge, 6/30/25.

[2] Ibid.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Investment Company Institute (ICI), Statistics, Combined Estimated Long-Term Flows and ETF Issuance, 7/2/25.

[5] U.S. Treasury International Capital Data for April 2025, June 18, 2025.

[6] Bloomberg Intelligence, North America Credit Strategy Dashboard, Trimmed Mean (Bottom/Top 10 percent), 6/30/25.

[7] “Regulating Imports with a Reciprocal Tariff to Rectify Trade Practices that Contribute to Large and Persistent Annual United States Goods Trade Deficits,” Presidential Actions, Executive Orders, The White House, 4/2/25.

[8] Financial Accounts of the United States, Flow of Funds Report, Federal Reserve System, First Quarter, 2025.

[9] Bloomberg Earnings Analysis, S&P 500 Index Consensus Earnings Growth (% y/y), 6/30/25.

[10] Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Agencies Request Comment on Proposal to Modify Certain Regulatory Capital Standards, 6/27/25.

[11] Bloomberg Law, Trump Signs Repeal of OCC Rule Tightening Bank Merger Reviews, Evan Weinberger, 6/21/25.

[12] Bloomberg Credit Rating Trends, Long Term Investment Grade Rating Changes (Moody’s, S&P, Fitch), 6/30/25.

[13] A z-score is a statistical measurement that indicates how far away a data point is from the mean of a dataset, measured in terms of standard deviations. It essentially standardizes a raw score, allowing for comparisons between different datasets or populations.

[14] The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate IG Bond Index, Breckinridge, 6/30/25.

[15] U.S. Treasury International Capital Data for April 2025, June 18, 2025.

BCAI-07032025-3oyhbe2t (7/9/2025)

DISCLAIMERS:

The content is intended for investment professionals and institutional investors.

This material provides general information and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer of services or products or as legal, tax or investment advice. Nothing contained herein should be considered a guide to security selection, asset allocation or portfolio construction.

All information and opinions are current as of the dates indicated and are subject to change. Breckinridge believes the data provided by unaffiliated third parties to be reliable, but investors should conduct their own independent verification prior to use. Some economic and market conditions contained herein have been obtained from published sources and/or prepared by third parties, and in certain cases have not been updated through the date hereof.

There is no assurance that any estimate, target, projection, or forward-looking statement (collectively, “estimates”) included in this material will be accurate or prove to be profitable; actual results may differ substantially. Breckinridge estimates are based on Breckinridge’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Other events that were not considered in formulating such projections could occur and may significantly affect the outcome, returns or performance.

Not all securities or issuers mentioned represent holdings in client portfolios. Some securities have been provided for illustrative purposes only and should not be construed as investment recommendations. Any illustrative engagement or sustainability analysis examples are intended to demonstrate Breckinridge’s research and investment process.

Yields and other characteristics are metrics that can help investors in valuing a security, portfolio, or composite. Yields do not represent performance results, but they are one of several components that contribute to the return of a security, portfolio, or composite. Yields and other characteristics are presented gross of advisory fees.

All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. No investment or risk management strategy, including diversification, can guarantee positive results or risk elimination in any market.

Past performance is not indicative of future results. Breckinridge makes no assurances, warranties, or representations that any strategies described herein will meet their investment objectives or incur any profits. Performance results for Breckinridge’s investment strategies include the reinvestment of interest and any other earnings, but do not reflect any brokerage or trading costs a client would have paid. Results may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors would have had on the accounts during the time period. Due to differences in client restrictions, objectives, cash flows, and other such factors, individual client account performance may differ substantially from the performance presented.

Index results are shown for illustrative purposes and do not represent the performance of any specific investment. Indices are unmanaged and investors cannot directly invest in them. They do not reflect any management, custody, transaction, or other expenses, and generally assume reinvestment of dividends, income, and capital gains. Performance of indices may be more or less volatile than any investment strategy.

Fixed income investments have varying degrees of credit risk, interest rate risk, default risk, and prepayment and extension risk. In general, bond prices rise when interest rates fall and vice versa.

Equity investments are volatile and can decline significantly in response to investor reception of the issuer, market, economic, industry, political, regulatory, or other conditions.

BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). Bloomberg does not approve or endorse this material or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.