The content on this website is intended for investment professionals and institutional asset owners. Individual retail investors should consult with their financial advisers before using any of the content contained on this website. Breckinridge uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website, you consent to our cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. By clicking “I Agree” and accessing this website, you represent and warrant that you are agreeing to the above statements. In addition, you have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions of this website.

Investing Commentary published on February 10, 2020

January 2020 Market Commentary

Summary

  • U.S. Treasury Curve: Treasury yields fell sharply at month-end. The 10-year Treasury closed at 1.51 percent, a 41-basis point (bp) decline over the month.
  • Tax-Exempt Municipal/Treasury (M/T) Ratios: Ratios declined throughout the month with the 5-year ratio falling to the lowest level since 1988 before recovering at month end.
  • Municipal Market Technicals: New issue supply totaled $29 billion, per The Bond Buyer, an 18 percent year-over-year increase reflecting strong municipal bond mutual fund inflows.
  • Corporate Market Technicals: Investment grade (IG) corporate fixed-rate supply was $172 billion in January, a 16 percent year-over-year increase and IG mutual fund flows remained strong, per Barclays.
  • Securitized Trends: Risk-off sentiment benefited agency commercial mortgage-backed securities (agency CMBS) and asset-backed securities (ABS). Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) underperformed on increasing volatility and prepayment concerns driven by lower interest rates.

Market Review

Risk assets ignored escalating tensions in Iran and Iraq and President Donald Trump’s impeachment trial as equities soared to new highs early in the month before retracing after heightened investor concerns related to the coronavirus caused a flight to quality at the end of January.

As anticipated, the FOMC held rates steady. In its statement, the committee characterized the labor market as “strong” and economic growth as “rising at a moderate rate,” while indicating that it believes its policy is geared toward “inflation returning to the Committee’s symmetric 2 percent objective.”

With a risk-off sentiment, Treasury yields declined sharply at month-end. The 10-year Treasury closed at 1.51 percent, a decline of 41-basis points (bps) over the month. After steepening in December, the Treasury curve bull flattened – longer-term rates falling more quickly than shorter-term rates – with the 2s/10s curve closing at 19bps. We believe concerns around a recovery in global growth and easy monetary policy should keep rates rangebound from here.

Municipal Market Review

While the January Effect – when demand for municipal bonds from maturing bonds and coupon payments exceeds new issue supply – was in full force over the month and yields reached historic lows, municipals could not keep pace with the sharp Treasury rally and underperformed across most of the curve. The 10-year and 30-year AAA closed the month at 1.15 percent and 1.80 percent, marking all-time lows, according to Siebert Williams Shank & Co.

M/T ratios—measuring the yield offered by municipal bonds as a percentage of that of Treasuries—declined throughout the month before improving somewhat as January ended. During the month, the 5-year dropped to 55 percent, the lowest level since 1988, and finished January at 63 percent, while 10-year and 30-year spots closed at 76 percent and 90 percent, respectively.

New issue supply totaled $29 billion, per The Bond Buyer, an 18 percent increase compared to January 2019. Taxable municipal issuance surged 117 percent year-over-year to $6.6 billion, while tax-exempts represented $22.5 billion. According to Barclays, municipal bond mutual fund inflows totaled $11.5 billion for the month, marking 56 consecutive weeks of positive flows. Twice in January, weekly inflows reached record levels. Inflows were more than adequate to absorb new issuance.

The BBG Municipal Bond Index returned 1.80 percent and the BBG Municipal 1-10 Year Blend Index gained 1.29 percent. Like last month, maturities 5 years and longer had the strongest returns while bonds rated BBB outperformed all other rating categories by a substantial margin, Bloomberg data showed.

The credit environment remains stable as the state budget season unfolds. Noteworthy items include: as New York State nears fiscal year-end 2020, the governor has proposed a Medicaid redesign and some cuts to local aid to close the budget gap; Connecticut’s governor has refused to spend down newly found reserves; and declining natural gas prices are pressuring leading indices in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, but budget weakness has yet to emerge. In addition, Democrats in the House of Representatives announced an infrastructure proposal in late January that drew support from the Speaker of the House and the Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee who said of the bill, “I think Build America Bonds ought to be a place to start.” It is too soon to tell if the effort will garner enough support to advance, but the prospect of an infrastructure program that includes a program like Build America Bonds would be a boon to the municipal market, in our view.

Corporate Market Review

Equities extended their December 2019 rally into mid-January as investors seemed buoyed by moderately positive economic, purchasing manager index and gross domestic product data. Risk-off sentiment accelerated later in the month as nascent concerns about global growth appeared to intensify as news of the coronavirus prompted an equity market pullback.

Corporate bond spreads widened 9bps during the month, with the BBG U.S. Corporate Index spread ending the month at 102 bps. Corporate bonds underperformed similar-duration Treasuries by 80bps for the month. One of the most notable effects as the month wore on was the precipitous decline in oil prices, which was reflected in the bonds of companies operating in the Energy sector.

The best-performing sectors and industries were Foreign local government, financial companies, building materials, office real estate investment trusts and supranational bonds, according to Barclays. The worst performing sectors and industries were independent oil, oil field services, refining, midstream oil and health insurance. Reporting of fourth-quarter corporate earnings was still in the early stages as January ended, with no undue broad-based concerns emerging to date.

Index-eligible IG corporate fixed-rate supply was $172 billion in January, according to Barclays data. That total compared with $148 billion during the same period one year ago. The 16 percent year-over-year increase reflected continued strong issuance trends. IG fixed-rate net supply of $80 billion during January was nearly 14 percent higher year-over-year, per Barclays.

The BBG Intermediate U.S. Government/Credit Index advanced 1.42 percent for the month.

Securitized Market Review

Within securitized bond markets in January, the general risk-off sentiment benefited agency CMBS and ABS, but lower rates led to increased volatility within MBS that weighed on the sector. Fund flows into mortgage funds were strong throughout January with two consecutive weeks of flows in excess of $1 billion.

Agency CMBS led the way for securitized markets with a total return of 2.55 percent, according to Barclays data. Agency mortgage-backed securities (agency MBS), as represented by the BBG MBS Index, earned a total return of 70bps, trailing Treasuries of similar duration.

Coronavirus Perspective

On February 3, Breckinridge Chief Investment Officer Laura Lake offered perspective on the coronavirus, saying, “With onset of the coronavirus, the risks to the downside have clearly increased, in terms of slowing growth, lower Treasury yields and wider spreads. We did not make any changes to our rate forecasts for the second quarter of 2020 or positioning targets believing it is too soon. Most economic estimates are unclear as to the severity of the health crisis and its potential economic effects.

“For comparison, we looked back to the SARS outbreak of 2003, and based on news and industry reports as well as our own research, this virus appears to be more widespread and more contagious than SARS, but also less deadly than SARS. One upside, as a global community we are much more connected and informed than in 2003, with knowledge of prevention and the ability to analyze and implement potential cures more quickly. In addition, China is restricting travel more aggressively than in the past. On the other hand, global supply chains are not more interconnected, and China has become a wealthier country, allowing for greater access to global travel out of mainland China than in 2003.

“While most businesses and the economies can withstand a slowdown for a short period of time, a multi-month shutdown of supply chains or other operations will prove detrimental. Industry researchers have estimated that if mid- to late-February fails to see the outbreak brought under control, it could bring a greater risk that a more negative outcome will result.”

 

DISCLAIMER: The opinions and views expressed are those of Breckinridge Capital Advisors, Inc. They are current as of the date(s) indicated but are subject to change without notice. Any estimates, targets, and projections are based on Breckinridge research, analysis and assumptions. No assurances can be made that any such estimate, target or projection will be accurate; actual results may differ substantially.

Nothing contained herein should be construed or relied upon as financial, legal or tax advice. All investments involve risks, including the loss of principal. Investors should consult with their financial professional before making any investment decisions.

While Breckinridge believes the assessment of ESG criteria can improve overall credit risk analysis, there is no guarantee that integrating ESG analysis will provide improved risk-adjusted returns over any specific time period.

Some information has been taken directly from unaffiliated third-party sources. Breckinridge believes such information is reliable but does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.

Any specific securities mentioned are for illustrative and example only. They do not necessarily represent actual investments in any client portfolio.

BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). BARCLAYS® is a trademark and service mark of Barclays Bank Plc (collectively with its affiliates, “Barclays”), used under license. Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors, including Barclays, own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Barclays Indices.

Neither Bloomberg nor Barclays approves or endorses this material, or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.