The content on this website is intended for investment professionals and institutional asset owners. Individual retail investors should consult with their financial advisers before using any of the content contained on this website. Breckinridge uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website, you consent to our cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. By clicking “I Agree” and accessing this website, you represent and warrant that you are agreeing to the above statements. In addition, you have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions of this website. The content on this website is not intended for use or distribution outside of the U.S., unless permitted by applicable law.


ESG Newsletter published on July 1, 2021

2021 Climate Summit Brings Pledges to Combat Climate Risk


  • In commitments at once ambitious and daunting, countries are accelerating decarbonization.
  • At an April summit, the U.S. nearly doubled prior carbon emission reductions targets.
  • Progress and implications for corporate and municipal bond credit quality will be monitored.

At the Biden Administration’s virtual Climate Summit in April, world leaders from 40 countries gathered and several announced accelerated long-term targets to decarbonize their economies.

The new commitments are ambitious and the challenges to achieving them are daunting.

The Biden administration’s focus on climate as a policy driver continues to be reflected in its actions at the Climate Summit and subsequent policy and legislation. Those initiatives include expansive infrastructure (the proposed American Jobs Plan) and economic support (the already enacted American Rescue Plan and the proposed American Family Plan). The White House’s May executive order “to advance consistent, clear, intelligible, comparable, and accurate disclosure of climate-related financial risk” is another example.

April Climate Summit Featured a Recommitment to Paris Agreement

At the April climate summit, the U.S. pledged to lower its carbon emissions by 50 percent to 52 percent by 2030 from 2005 levels, nearly doubling prior targets. Canada pledged to lower by 40 to 45 percent by 2030, up from a prior target of 30 percent. Japan pledged a 46 percent reduction by 2030 from 2013 levels, compared with a prior target of 26 percent. China reiterated plans to reach peak carbon emissions by 2030 and reach net-zero by 2060.

With its new target, the U.S. is catching up to the UK and European Union (EU). According to the BBC,1 the UK is committed to reducing carbon emissions by 78 percent by 2035 while the EU’s commitment is 55 percent by 2030.

On April 21, 2021, the U.S. submitted its new target as a Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement. President Biden recommitted the country to the 2015 global climate accord upon taking office in January 2021, after the prior U.S. administration had withdrawn from participation.

NDCs are the core requirement of the Paris Agreement, representing each country’s commitment to reduce national CO2 emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change. The Paris Agreement’s goal is to achieve net zero emissions by 2050, keeping the average temperature rise in this century to well below 2 degrees Celsius versus pre-industrial levels, while pursuing efforts to limit the temperature rise to 1.5 degrees.

Essentially, net zero means that the amount of greenhouse gases (GHG) produced is offset by emissions removed or sequestered from the atmosphere over a specified time period, so the net amount emitted is zero.

Reaching the climate goals entails quick and significant changes to everyday life from the types of cars we drive, to how we heat our homes, to how we power manufacturing plants and office buildings. As recently as the end of the June 11 to 13 G7 Summit in the UK, supporters and skeptics alike pointed to the session’s final joint G7 communique, as being notable for weaving climate throughout its many goals, while leaving out key details of the process of reaching the goals.

In April, The New York Times cited studies that estimate by 2030: half of all new cars sold would need to be electric; nearly all coal fired plants would have to be retired, and the number of wind turbines and solar panels could quadruple. Several Breckinridge analysts discussed the subject in Breckinridge’s spring ESG Newsletter.

What Comes Next?

To help achieve its 2030 GHG reduction goal and the Paris Agreement more generally, the U.S. is creating several initiatives, including 1) a Global Climate Ambition Initiative to support developing countries in establishing net-zero strategies and setting and achieving their NDCs; 2) the first U.S. International Climate Finance Plan; and 3) international efforts to develop strategies and technologies to enable the global energy and economic transition.

At home, the Biden administration released an Executive Order on Climate-Related Financial Risk on May 20. The goals of the order include to:

  • “Advance consistent, clear, intelligible, comparable, and accurate disclosure of climate-related financial risk, including both physical and transition risks
  • “Act to mitigate that risk and its drivers, while accounting for and addressing disparate impacts on disadvantaged communities and communities of color and
  • Spur “the creation of well-paying jobs; and achieve our target of a net-zero emissions economy by no later than 2050.”

As a next step, the order directs establishment of a Climate-Related Financial Risk Strategy. Members of the President’s economic and climate teams in coordination with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget are to develop within four months of the date of the order, a comprehensive, government-wide strategy regarding:

  • Measurement, assessment, mitigation, and disclosure of climate-related financial risk to programs, assets, and liabilities in order to increase the long-term stability of Federal operations.
  • Financing needs associated with achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions for the U.S. economy by no later than 2050, limiting global average temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius, and adapting to the acute and chronic impacts of climate change: and
  • Areas in which private and public investments can play complementary roles in meeting these financing needs.

Further, the order charges to other branches of the government to development of plans to address of climate-related financial risk by financial regulators (Treasury, Financial Stability Oversight Council); resilience of life savings and pensions (Labor); federal lending, underwriting, and procurement (OMB and the National Economic Council, in consultation Treasury); and a long-term budget outlook (OMB, in consultation with Treasury, the Council of Economic Advisers, the National Economic Council, and the National Climate Advisor).

Through the order, the President formalized his whole-government approach to analyze and mitigate the risk that climate change poses to homeowners and consumers, businesses and workers, and the financial system and federal government Itself.

While the U.S. return to the Paris Agreement and the NDC announced at the April 2021 Climate Summit are formidable, the President’s subsequent actions and executive order in May seek to establish the process for the federal government to achieve net zero emissions by 2050. Progress from here, and its implications for credit quality in the corporate and municipal bond markets will be monitored carefully going forward.





This material provides general and/or educational information and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer of Breckinridge services or products or as legal, tax or investment advice. The content is current as of the time of writing or as designated within the material. All information, including the opinions and views of Breckinridge, is subject to change without notice.

Any estimates, targets, and projections are based on Breckinridge research, analysis, and assumptions. No assurances can be made that any such estimate, target or projection will be accurate; actual results may differ substantially.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Breckinridge makes no assurances, warranties or representations that any strategies described herein will meet their investment objectives or incur any profits. Any index results shown are for illustrative purposes and do not represent the performance of any specific investment. Indices are unmanaged and investors cannot directly invest in them. They do not reflect any management, custody, transaction or other expenses, and generally assume reinvestment of dividends, income and capital gains. Performance of indices may be more or less volatile than any investment strategy.

Performance results for Breckinridge’s investment strategies include the reinvestment of interest and any other earnings, but do not reflect any brokerage or trading costs a client would have paid. Results may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors would have had on the accounts during the time period. Due to differences in client restrictions, objectives, cash flows, and other such factors, individual client account performance may differ substantially from the performance presented.

All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss. Fixed income investments have varying degrees of credit risk, interest rate risk, default risk, and prepayment and extension risk. In general, bond prices rise when interest rates fall and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities. Income from municipal bonds can be declared taxable because of unfavorable changes in tax laws, adverse interpretations by the IRS or state tax authorities, or noncompliant conduct of a bond issuer.

Breckinridge believes that the assessment of ESG risks, including those associated with climate change, can improve overall risk analysis. When integrating ESG analysis with traditional financial analysis, Breckinridge’s investment team will consider ESG factors but may conclude that other attributes outweigh the ESG considerations when making investment decisions.

There is no guarantee that integrating ESG analysis will improve risk-adjusted returns, lower portfolio volatility over any specific time period, or outperform the broader market or other strategies that do not utilize ESG analysis when selecting investments. The consideration of ESG factors may limit investment opportunities available to a portfolio. In addition, ESG data often lacks standardization, consistency and transparency and for certain companies such data may not be available, complete or accurate.

Breckinridge’s ESG analysis is based on third party data and Breckinridge analysts’ internal analysis. Analysts will review a variety of sources such as corporate sustainability reports, data subscriptions, and research reports to obtain available metrics for internally developed ESG frameworks. Qualitative ESG information is obtained from corporate sustainability reports, engagement discussion with corporate management teams, among others. A high sustainability rating does not mean it will be included in a portfolio, nor does it mean that a bond will provide profits or avoid losses.

Net Zero alignment and classifications are defined by Breckinridge and are subjective in nature. Although our classification methodology is informed by the Net Zero Investment Framework Implementation Guide as outlined by the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, it may not align with the methodology or definition used by other companies or advisors. Breckinridge is a member of the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials and uses the financed emissions methodology to track, monitor and allocate emissions. These differences should be considered when comparing Net Zero application and strategies.

Targets and goals for Net Zero can change over time and could differ from individual client portfolios. Breckinridge will continue to invest in companies with exposure to fossil fuels; however, we may adjust our exposure to these types of investments based on net zero alignment and classifications over time.

Any specific securities mentioned are for illustrative and example only. They do not necessarily represent actual investments in any client portfolio.

The effectiveness of any tax management strategy is largely dependent on each client’s entire tax and investment profile, including investments made outside of Breckinridge’s advisory services. As such, there is a risk that the strategy used to reduce the tax liability of the client is not the most effective for every client. Breckinridge is not a tax advisor and does not provide personal tax advice. Investors should consult with their tax professionals regarding tax strategies and associated consequences.

Federal and local tax laws can change at any time. These changes can impact tax consequences for investors, who should consult with a tax professional before making any decisions.

The content may contain information taken from unaffiliated third-party sources. Breckinridge believes the data provided by unaffiliated third parties to be reliable but investors should conduct their own independent verification prior to use. Some economic and market conditions contained herein have been obtained from published sources and/or prepared by third parties, and in certain cases have not been updated through the date hereof. All information contained herein is subject to revision. Any third-party websites included in the content has been provided for reference only. Please see the Terms & Conditions page for third party licensing disclaimers.