The content on this website is intended for investment professionals and institutional asset owners. Individual retail investors should consult with their financial advisers before using any of the content contained on this website. Breckinridge uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website, you consent to our cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. By clicking “I Agree” and accessing this website, you represent and warrant that you are agreeing to the above statements. In addition, you have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions of this website. The content on this website is not intended for use or distribution outside of the U.S., unless permitted by applicable law.


Commentary published on June 8, 2022

May 2022 Market Commentary


  • U.S. Treasury Curve: U.S. Treasury rates declined through 10 years, and the curve steepened modestly (See Figure 1).
  • Municipal Market Technicals: May issuance was $32 billion, 9 percent lower than the same month in 2021. At about $8 billion, the monthly pace of mutual fund outflows declined.
  • Corporate Market Technicals: Investment grade (IG) fixed-rate bond supply for May was $107 billion. IG bond funds reported $12 billion of outflows during the month.
  • Securitized Trends: Mortgage-backed securities (MBS) delivered positive excess returns compared with Treasuries of similar maturities. Total returns for asset-backed securities (ABS) and Agency Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (ACMBS) were positive.

(The following commentary is a summary of discussions among members of the Breckinridge Capital Advisors Investment Committee as they reviewed monthly activity in the markets and investment returns. The members of the Investment Committee under the leadership of Chief Investment Officer Ognjen Sosa, CAIA, FRM, are Co-Head, Portfolio Management, Matthew Buscone; Senior Portfolio Manager Sara Chanda; Co-Head, Research, Nicholas Elfner; Co-Head, Portfolio Management, Jeffrey Glenn, CFA; Head, Municipal Trading, Benjamin Pease; and Co-Head, Research, Adam Stern, JD.)

Market Review

The Treasury curve steepened during May as yields declined from 2 to 10 years while increasing slightly from 20 to 30 years (See Figure 1). The ICE BofA Merrill Lynch Option Volatility Estimate (MOVE) Index, a measure of U.S. interest rate volatility, declined in May, which contributed to the recovery in risk assets later in the month (See Figure 2). Despite continued uncertainty over inflation, a 50-basis point (bps) increase by the Federal Reserve (Fed) in the federal funds rate, and Russia’s continued war on Ukraine, yields declined, and markets edged out gains. 

Treasury yields for maturities in the 2-, 5-, and 10-year ranges were lower by 16, 14 and 9bps, respectively. The 30-year yield was 5bps higher.

The May S&P 500 Index return was flat after a gain in excess of 6 percent during the last full week. The Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index’s monthly gain was 0.64 percent, with bonds of intermediate maturity and lower credit quality within the investment grade segment leading the way.

Tighter financial conditions should slow growth over the next 12-18 months. Sentiment remains negative based on consumer and business surveys but, in somewhat of a disconnect, spending and business activity held up. Inflation expectations fell, with the 5-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) breakeven, a common measure of interest rate expectations, at 3 percent by month end, compared to 3.75 percent in late March, according to Treasury Department data.

In the view of the Breckinridge Investment Committee, inflation is starting to moderate with growth slowing but still above trend. Wall Street analyst estimates for second quarter gross domestic product are in the 2 to 3 percent range area and about 2.5 percent for the full year 2022. We expect the Fed to push the federal funds rate—currently at a 0.75 to 1.0 percent target range—to the 2.25 to 2.5 percent range, in-line with the minutes of the Fed’s May meeting. The path of Fed policy gets less certain for 2023.

Municipal Market Review

Municipal yields declined across the curve (See Figure 3). Yields fell 36 and 32bps, respectively, in the 2- and 5-year maturities, while declining 22 and 18bps in 10 and 30 years. The 2s/10s curve steepened.

Municipal bonds staged a remarkable turnaround mid-month and outperformed Treasuries across the curve. After peaking at elevated levels mid-month, ratios moved lower into month-end, ending at levels closer to their long-term averages (See Figure 4).

Higher rates have led to an almost 50% decline in refunding volume year-to-date, while new money issuance has increased almost 10 percent. May municipal bond issuance of $32 billion marked a 9 percent drop compared to May 2021, about 6 percent lower than April 2022, per The Bond Buyer. May tax-exempt bond issuance was 7 percent lower than May 2021, while monthly taxable municipal bond issuance was nearly 31 percent lower year-over-year. Asset outflows continued from municipal bond funds, topping $8 billion, per Lipper, but were substantially lower than April’s total.

The Bloomberg Managed Money Short/Intermediate (1-10) Index gained 1.71 percent during May and the Bloomberg 1-10 Year Blend Index added 1.39 percent. Intermediate maturity bonds, particularly bonds in the 3- to 10-year maturity range, outperformed shorter and longer maturity issues. Bonds with the highest credit quality ratings in the investment grade spectrum performed best during the month.

Corporate Market Review

IG corporate bond spreads tightened by 4bps, per Bloomberg data, ending May at 130bps. The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Investment Grade (IG) Index gained 0.93 percent on a total return basis and delivered an excess return of 0.79 percent compared with duration-matched Treasuries.

Bloomberg data showed that corporate bonds rated A and higher outperformed BBB-rated bonds in May, with the A-rated issues delivering the best returns. Intermediate maturity IG bonds—3 to 10-year bonds—outperformed shorter maturity bonds.

The best-performing corporate sectors were cable satellite, telecommunications, sovereigns, pharmaceuticals, and integrated oil, according to Bloomberg. The worst-performing were gaming, airlines, foreign local government, real estate investment trusts, and building materials.

Index-eligible IG bond issuance in May, per Bloomberg, was $107 billion, lower than April’s issuance by about 19 percent. Net issuance, after redemptions, was a $10 billion. According to Emerging Portfolio Fund Research, IG bond funds reported approximately $12 billion of outflows.

Securitized Market Review

MBS enjoyed a bounce back month in May. The Bloomberg MBS Index generated 70bps of excess returns. Bonds with 2.5 to 3.5 percent coupons led the way, with 3 percent coupon MBS earning 104bps in excess returns. Governmental National Mortgage Association (Ginnie Maes) MBS continued to outperform conventionals (MBS issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Maes) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Macs)), with Ginnie Maes achieving a 2bps excess return advantage over conventionals.

ACMBS earned 90bps in total return and 23bps in excess returns. Non-agency CMBS total and excess returns were negative at 36bps and 103bps, respectively.

In the asset-backed security (ABS) market, the Bloomberg ABS Index spread widened. During May, ABS backed by auto loans had a negative excess return of 21bps, while negative excess return for credit card-backed securities was 35bps. Auto loan and credit card ABS sectors each delivered a positive total return of 31bps.


#297168 (6/7/2022)


This material provides general and/or educational information and should not be construed as a solicitation or offer of Breckinridge services or products or as legal, tax or investment advice. The content is current as of the time of writing or as designated within the material. All information, including the opinions and views of Breckinridge, is subject to change without notice.

Any estimates, targets, and projections are based on Breckinridge research, analysis, and assumptions. No assurances can be made that any such estimate, target or projection will be accurate; actual results may differ substantially.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Breckinridge makes no assurances, warranties or representations that any strategies described herein will meet their investment objectives or incur any profits. Any index results shown are for illustrative purposes and do not represent the performance of any specific investment. Indices are unmanaged and investors cannot directly invest in them. They do not reflect any management, custody, transaction or other expenses, and generally assume reinvestment of dividends, income and capital gains. Performance of indices may be more or less volatile than any investment strategy.

Performance results for Breckinridge’s investment strategies include the reinvestment of interest and any other earnings, but do not reflect any brokerage or trading costs a client would have paid. Results may not reflect the impact that any material market or economic factors would have had on the accounts during the time period. Due to differences in client restrictions, objectives, cash flows, and other such factors, individual client account performance may differ substantially from the performance presented.

All investments involve risk, including loss of principal. Diversification cannot assure a profit or protect against loss. Fixed income investments have varying degrees of credit risk, interest rate risk, default risk, and prepayment and extension risk. In general, bond prices rise when interest rates fall and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities. Income from municipal bonds can be declared taxable because of unfavorable changes in tax laws, adverse interpretations by the IRS or state tax authorities, or noncompliant conduct of a bond issuer.

Breckinridge believes that the assessment of ESG risks, including those associated with climate change, can improve overall risk analysis. When integrating ESG analysis with traditional financial analysis, Breckinridge’s investment team will consider ESG factors but may conclude that other attributes outweigh the ESG considerations when making investment decisions.

There is no guarantee that integrating ESG analysis will improve risk-adjusted returns, lower portfolio volatility over any specific time period, or outperform the broader market or other strategies that do not utilize ESG analysis when selecting investments. The consideration of ESG factors may limit investment opportunities available to a portfolio. In addition, ESG data often lacks standardization, consistency and transparency and for certain companies such data may not be available, complete or accurate.

Breckinridge’s ESG analysis is based on third party data and Breckinridge analysts’ internal analysis. Analysts will review a variety of sources such as corporate sustainability reports, data subscriptions, and research reports to obtain available metrics for internally developed ESG frameworks. Qualitative ESG information is obtained from corporate sustainability reports, engagement discussion with corporate management teams, among others. A high sustainability rating does not mean it will be included in a portfolio, nor does it mean that a bond will provide profits or avoid losses.

Net Zero alignment and classifications are defined by Breckinridge and are subjective in nature. Although our classification methodology is informed by the Net Zero Investment Framework Implementation Guide as outlined by the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change, it may not align with the methodology or definition used by other companies or advisors. Breckinridge is a member of the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financials and uses the financed emissions methodology to track, monitor and allocate emissions. These differences should be considered when comparing Net Zero application and strategies.

Targets and goals for Net Zero can change over time and could differ from individual client portfolios. Breckinridge will continue to invest in companies with exposure to fossil fuels; however, we may adjust our exposure to these types of investments based on net zero alignment and classifications over time.

Any specific securities mentioned are for illustrative and example only. They do not necessarily represent actual investments in any client portfolio.

The effectiveness of any tax management strategy is largely dependent on each client’s entire tax and investment profile, including investments made outside of Breckinridge’s advisory services. As such, there is a risk that the strategy used to reduce the tax liability of the client is not the most effective for every client. Breckinridge is not a tax advisor and does not provide personal tax advice. Investors should consult with their tax professionals regarding tax strategies and associated consequences.

Federal and local tax laws can change at any time. These changes can impact tax consequences for investors, who should consult with a tax professional before making any decisions.

The content may contain information taken from unaffiliated third-party sources. Breckinridge believes the data provided by unaffiliated third parties to be reliable but investors should conduct their own independent verification prior to use. Some economic and market conditions contained herein have been obtained from published sources and/or prepared by third parties, and in certain cases have not been updated through the date hereof. All information contained herein is subject to revision. Any third-party websites included in the content has been provided for reference only. Please see the Terms & Conditions page for third party licensing disclaimers.