The content on this website is intended for investment professionals and institutional asset owners. Individual retail investors should consult with their financial advisers before using any of the content contained on this website. Breckinridge uses cookies to improve user experience. By using our website, you consent to our cookies in accordance with our cookie policy. By clicking “I Agree” and accessing this website, you represent and warrant that you are agreeing to the above statements. In addition, you have read, understood and agree to the terms and conditions of this website. The content on this website is not intended for use or distribution outside of the U.S., unless permitted by applicable law.


Commentary published on February 7, 2022

January 2022 Market Commentary


  • U.S. Treasury Curve: U.S. Treasury rates increased, and the curve flattened. (See Figure 1)
  • Municipal Market Technicals: January issuance was $24 billion, 37 percent lower than December. Monthly mutual fund outflows were about $1 billion in January.
  • Corporate Market Technicals: Investment grade (IG) fixed-rate bond supply for January was $181 billion. IG bond funds reported $8 billion of outflows during the month.
  • Securitized Trends: Excess returns for asset-backed securities (ABS) were mixed. Agency commercial mortgage-backed securities (ACMBS) were slightly positive, while residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities (MBS and CMBS, respectively) were negative.

(The following commentary is a summary of discussions among members of the Breckinridge Capital Advisors Investment Committee as they reviewed monthly activity in the markets and investment returns. The members of the Investment Committee under the leadership of Chief Investment Officer Ognjen Sosa, CAIA, FRM, are Co-Head, Portfolio Management, Matthew Buscone; Senior Portfolio Manager Sara Chanda; Co-Head, Research, Nicholas Elfner; Co-Head, Portfolio Management, Jeffrey Glenn, CFA; Head, Municipal Trading, Benjamin Pease; and Co-Head, Research, Adam Stern, JD.)

Market Review

A volatile January for investments, highlighted by a Federal Reserve (Fed) sounding more intent on raising interest rates, ended on a positive note, as bond and stock prices regained a measure of the losses realized earlier in the month.

Inflation continued to run well above trend with the Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) core deflator coming in at 4.9 percent, year-over-year. Treasury yields increased and market expectations for the number of fed funds rate increases in 2022 increased to 5 by year-end.

Through its statements before and after its January meeting, the Federal Open Market Committee appeared ready to start raising the federal funds rate from its zero-lower bound in March. At some point thereafter, the Fed will begin to reduce the size of its balance sheet, which has grown to $9 trillion in an effort to spark economic activity during the pandemic-induced economic restrictions.

The Treasury curve bear flattened (short term rates rise faster than long term rates) with 2-, 5-, 10-, and 30-year yields rising by 45, 35, 27, and 21 basis points (bps), respectively. The spread between the 2- and 5-year spots on the Treasury curve narrowed by 18bps, while the 2s/30s curve tightened by 24bps.

Municipal Market Review

Municipal bond yield increased, underperforming Treasuries during January (See Figure 2) and Municipal/Treasury ratios improved across the curve (See Figure 3). Municipal bond issuance slowed during the month.

The municipal yield curve finally responded to the flattening that had occurred in the Treasury curve. The 2- to 10-year slope has now fallen from just over 100bps at the end of October 2021 to 66bps at the end of January 2022.

Municipal yields at 2-, 5-, 10-, and 30-years rose by 66, 63, 52, and 46bps, respectively. The spread for the municipal 2s/10s curve narrowed by 14bps, while the 2s/30s municipal curve tightened by 20bps.

The underperformance of municipals drove ratios sharply higher during the month, rising to 77 percent for the two-year maturity, 87 percent for the 10-year, and 93 percent for the 30-year, flattening the ratio curve. Ratios at these more attractive levels allowed us opportunities to add bonds at more compelling yields from both an absolute and relative-value standpoint.

January issuance at $24 billion was 37 percent lower than the prior month and 15 percent lower than January 2021, per The Bond Buyer. At almost $19 billion, tax-exempt issuance was just 1.8 percent off last year’s January total, whereas taxable issuance dropped 54 percent from January 2021, as increasing interest rates made refinancing with taxable bonds less attractive.

Municipal bond fund flows were negative, the first monthly outflow since April 2020. Investment Company Institute data show that as of January 26, 2022, fund outflows had totaled about $1 billion during the month.

For January, the Bloomberg Managed Money Short/Intermediate (1-10) Index fell 2.63 percent while the Bloomberg 1-10 Year Blend Index declined 2.22 percent. Shorter-maturity bonds outperformed bonds at the long end of the curve. Municipal bonds with higher relative credit ratings outperformed bonds of lower quality.

Corporate Market Review

IG corporate bond spreads widened by 13bps in January, per Bloomberg data, to settle at 106bps. The Bloomberg U.S. Corporate Investment Grade (IG) Index fell 3.37 percent for January on a total return basis and 1.15 percent on an excess return basis compared with duration-matched Treasuries.

Bloomberg data showed that dispersion in performance among bonds based on credit-quality rating was limited with higher-quality issues slightly outperforming the lowest IG-quality bonds. IG corporate bonds with shorter maturities turned in the best performance on a total return basis.

The best-performing sectors were Automobiles, Commercial & Consumer Finance, Real Estate Investment Trusts, and Life Insurance. Underperforming sectors included Media & Entertainment, Technology, and Railroads.

Index-eligible IG bond issuance in January, per Bloomberg, was nearly $181 billion, a decrease from about $62 billion in December. Net issuance, after redemptions, was $90 billion, following a negative net total in December. According to EPFR, IG bond funds reported $8 billion of outflows in January.

Securitized Market Review

In securitized sectors in January, spreads widened across current coupon MBS, per Bloomberg data. The broad Bloomberg MBS Index had a negative excess return of 12bps. Within MBS, higher coupon securities outperformed lower coupons. Among ACMBS, spreads tightened, delivering a 1bp excess return. CMBS had a negative excess return of 2bps, per Bloomberg data

In the ABS market segment, spreads narrowed 6bps and 8bps for auto loan and credit card debt, respectively. Credit card-backed securities earned an excess return of 23bps, while securities backed by auto loans added 18bps in excess return for the month.


#283389 (2/8/2022)

DISCLAIMER: The opinions and views expressed are those of Breckinridge Capital Advisors, Inc. They are current as of the date(s) indicated but are subject to change without notice. Any estimates, targets, and projections are based on Breckinridge research, analysis, and assumptions. No assurances can be made that any such estimate, target or projection will be accurate; actual results may differ substantially.

There are risks associated with fixed income investments, including credit risk, interest rate risk, default risk, and prepayment and extension risk. In general, bond prices rise when interest rates fall and vice versa. This effect is usually more pronounced for longer-term securities. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Nothing contained herein should be construed or relied upon as financial, legal or tax advice. All investments involve risks, including the loss of principal. Investors should consult with their financial professional before making any investment decisions.

While Breckinridge believes the assessment of ESG criteria can improve overall credit risk analysis, there is no guarantee that integrating ESG analysis will provide improved risk-adjusted returns over any specific time period.

Some information has been taken directly from unaffiliated third-party sources. Breckinridge believes such information is reliable but does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness.

Any specific securities mentioned are for illustrative and example only. They do not necessarily represent actual investments in any client portfolio.

BLOOMBERG® is a trademark and service mark of Bloomberg Finance L.P. and its affiliates (collectively “Bloomberg”). BARCLAYS® is a trademark and service mark of Barclays Bank Plc (collectively with its affiliates, “Barclays”), used under license. Bloomberg or Bloomberg’s licensors, including Barclays, own all proprietary rights in the Bloomberg Barclays Indices.
Neither Bloomberg nor Barclays approves or endorses this material or guarantees the accuracy or completeness of any information herein, or makes any warranty, express or implied, as to the results to be obtained therefrom and, to the maximum extent allowed by law, neither shall have any liability or responsibility for injury or damages arising in connection therewith.